Research Paper

Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea. 31 December 2021. 409-415
https://doi.org/10.7734/COSEIK.2021.34.6.409

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • 1. Introduction

  • 2. Methodology

  •   2.1 CAD modeling

  •   2.2 Materials

  •   2.3 Cutting force

  •   2.4 Stability Analysis

  • 3. Results and Discussion

  •   3.1 Maximum stress and displacement

  •   3.2 S-N curve

  •   3.3 Modal analysis

  • 4. Conclusion

1. Introduction

Medical waste(MW) is the main source of pollutants produced by medical diagnosis, treatments, implants, and pharmaceutical residues(Chartier et al., 2014; Ilyas et al., 2020). According to World Health Organization(WHO), about 15% of total healthcare waste is regarded as hazardous infectious waste, while remaining as non-hazardous waste(WHO, 2018). However, the volume has a drastic increase after the COVID-19 outbreak. In Wuhan, China, the MW increased from 40 tons/day to 240 tons/day ,and in the US, it increased from 0.4 million tons/month to 2.5 million tons/month after the pandemic(Ilyas et al., 2020). Similarly, in South Korea, approximately 295 tons of MW was generated from February 2020 to March 2020, and was further increased to 20 tons per day in April 2020(Rhee, 2020; UNESCAP, 2020). Most of this MW is generated from hospitals(61%), quarantine centers(21%), isolation centers of COVID-19 patients(13%), and community treatment centers(Minister of Environment, 2020; Rhee, 2020).

The effective management of hazardous MW is highly imperative to prevent the risk of infection transmission by pathogenic microorganisms. Gastroenteric, respiratory, ocular, and skin infections are some of the potential infections caused by exposure to MW(Chartier et al., 2014). Moreover, the COVID-19 reproductive number may also increase as a consequence of exposure to COVID-19 MW, which includes surgical masks, gloves, personal protective equipment, and other contaminants(Li et al., 2020; Singh et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2020). The core principles and right resource investment to reduce such health adversities and also environmental concerns are highlighted by WHO in June 2017(Datta et al., 2018). Hence, proper disposal of MW with disinfection treatment is mandatory. Table 1 shows a comparison of various disinfection technologies used to disinfect medical waste. Incineration is the widely used disinfection method which is based on high-temperature combustion of MW at 800°C to 1200°C(Datta et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020).

Table 1.

Comparison of various MW disinfection technologies(Thind et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2020)

Disinfection technology Capacity Capital cost Operation cost Volume reduction Environmental pollution
Incineration High High Moderate High High
Chemical treatment Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate
Autoclave High Moderate Moderate Moderate Low
Microwave Low Low Low Low Low
Pyrolysis Moderate High High Moderate Low
Plasma Moderate High High Moderate Low
Alternative thermal treatment Moderate High Moderate Moderate Moderate

Although traditional incineration can deal with the high capacity of MW constantly with exceptional volume reduction, however, it possesses severe health and environmental concerns. In recent research, Bae et al. concluded that there is a relatively higher risk of asthma for people living in the 2km range of incinerator facilities in Seoul(Bae et al., 2020). This is due to the irreversible harm generated by the ash, which contains a high level of carbon footprints, dioxins, chlorines, mercury, and other heavy metals(Kim et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2018). High transportation costs and shortage of landfill sites are some other problems associated with incinerators(Kim and Jeong, 2017; Tsakalou et al., 2018). Therefore, it is advisable to use compact sterilization-based shredding technology(as shown in Fig. 1) to overcome the shortcomings of the traditional MW disinfecting technologies(Chaiyat, 2021; Hong et al., 2018; WHO, 2002). Shredder integrated disinfectant treatment technology exposes more area of the MW to disinfectant in the sterilization process as the volume of MW is reduced up to 90% by the shredder (Corum et al., 2015; Chaiyat, 2021; Kythavone and Chaiyat, 2020). Consequently, effective disinfection is obtained with minimal emission of pollutants(Gautam et al., 2010).

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/jcoseik/2021-034-06/N0040340608/images/Figure_jcoseik_34_06_08_F1.jpg
Fig. 1.

Compact shredder based steam sterilization process for infectious MW: 1) MW loading, 2) Volume reduction by shredding, 3) Steam heating, 4) Sterilization at high temperature and pressure, 5) Water cooling, 6) Water discharging, and 7) Unloading sterilized MW (Chaiyat, 2021)

The current study aims at designing an effective shredder system for MW sterilization. The purposes are twofold: designing the MW shredder in commercial CAD package; and predicting the structural stability of shredder blades through static, fatigue, and dynamic analysis on commercial FEM package, ABAQUS. This article deals with establishing the numerical model of shredder blade based on the loading conditions associated with cutting MW. Then, the static analysis procedure was adopted to evaluatethe stress, strain, and displacement at the cutter edge. The life of the shredder blade was predicted using the ABAQUS FE-SAFE module, and SN-curve was generated based on the actual load cycle. Modal analysis was also performed to check the dynamic stability of the shredding system. Finally, the potential of using such shredder-based sterilization technology has been analyzed in terms of the obtained results.

2. Methodology

This section introduces the CAD models, materials, and the complete scheme of loads and boundary conditions considered in the current study. Moreover, the complete methodology to perform static, fatigue and dynamic analysis is also discussed in this section.

2.1 CAD modeling

The blade geometry and 2D CAD drawings were designed at Samyoung Plant Co., Ltd, South Korea. The drawings were then converted into 3D models using CAD software. The assembled view and the blade geometry of the developed models are shown in Fig. 2.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/jcoseik/2021-034-06/N0040340608/images/Figure_jcoseik_34_06_08_F2.jpg
Fig. 2.

CAD modeling of the complete shredding system, (a) shredder assembly, and (b) cutting blade geometry

2.2 Materials

Lack of knowledge regarding material, its behavior and associated additional costs for fabrication of the structure may result in improper material selection. Hence, the material selection is purely based on the design requirements including low density, high strength and stiffness, and high fatigue resistance. Hardox- 550 is used as the blade material due to its low wear and high mechanical performance. Mechanical properties of Hardox-550 are shown in Table 2(Oxelösund, 2002; Voicu et al., 2020). SS400 and S45C are used for most of the remaining components, as they are widely used for machine structures. FC250(grey cast iron) is used in bearing cover and housing. For the rest of this study, H-550 will adopted as the blade material.

Table 2.

Material properties of HARDOX-550 blade material

HARDOX 550
Elastic Modulus 200GPa
Poisson Ratio 0.3
Density 8100kg/m3
Yield Strength 1400MPa
Tensile Strength 1700MPa
Hardness 550HBW

2.3 Cutting force

The prediction of the cutting force is based on the pre-defined motor specification. Fundamental machine design expressions were used to calculate the cutting force from motor power. The schematic representation of the shredder system transmission for cutting force calculation is shown in Fig. 3. The torque for 37kW (1500rpm) motor given in the drawings was evaluated using the following expression:

(1)
Torque=60×Power(kW)2π×Speed(rpm)

Then, based on the 1:21 reducer the torque transmitted to the driving shaft was evaluated and converted to force using blade radius. This came out to be 38.8kN, which is the cutting force produced at the blade edge and has been used to further analyze the shredder system.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/jcoseik/2021-034-06/N0040340608/images/Figure_jcoseik_34_06_08_F3.jpg
Fig. 3.

Schematic representation of the shredder system transmission

2.4 Stability Analysis

The shredder blade shown in Fig. 4(b) was used to perform the static analysis. The developed CAD model was imported to the ABAQUS in IGES format. Material properties of H-550 were assigned to the blade. Inner surfaces of the blade were assigned encastre constraint to restrict their motion in all degrees of freedom(DOFs). Pressure force of 38.8kN was applied to the blade surface, and a static general step was used with the output request for maximum von-mises stress, total strain, and maximum displacement.

The same model generated in the elastic stress analysis step was then imported to the ABAQUS FE-SAFE module to perform fatigue analysis. Same material properties were added in the FESAFE module, and the time-dependent fatigue load cycle was defined.

Dynamic analysis was performed on the cutting blades mounted on the shaft. Both ends of the shaft were fixed and, interaction between the blades and shaft surface were defined using the contact pairs in ABAQUS. Due to the complex blade and shaft geometry, 10-node quadratic tetrahedron(C3D10) elements were used to mesh the model.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/jcoseik/2021-034-06/N0040340608/images/Figure_jcoseik_34_06_08_F4.jpg
Fig. 4.

(a) Mesh convergence study for the static analysis, and (b) blade model used to perform static analysis

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 Maximum stress and displacement

The 8-node linear brick elements(C3D8R) were used to perform linear elastic stress analysis at different mesh sizes. The mesh convergence study for the static analysis is shown in Fig. 4(a), where von-mises stress is plotted against the number of elements in the finite element model. It was observed that the analysis converges at the mesh size of 1.35 with 659,448 elements. The maximum stress of 279MPa was produced at this mesh, as shown in Fig. 4(b), with the maximum displacement of 0.181 mm. The results also revealed that the maximum elastic strain produced in the system is 1.46×10-3. Since the yield strength of blade material is 1400MPa, FOS of 5 was observed, which is beneficial in reducing the cause of potential failure in shredder blade.

3.2 S-N curve

Using the specified speed of the shaft(30rpm), each blade has contact with MW once every 2 seconds, which is used to develop the fatigue load cycle. The time-dependent fatigue load cycle used for fatigue analysis is shown in Fig. 5(a). Since one edge of the blade is used at a given time to cut MW, the work cycle of only that blade has been used in the fatigue analysis to reduce computational cost. The S-N curve for the blade is shown in Fig. 5(b). It has been observed that at the maximum stress (279MPa) evaluated in static analysis, estimated life of the blade is 2.3×105 cycles. Also, as the load is reduced by 10% in each increment, number of cycles were increased. Endurance limit has been achieved at stress less then 240MPa, which corresponds to the 35kN load. Moreover, shortest life of 4.8×105 cycles has been predicted at the stress of 412.4MPa, while any increase in stress will further reduce the life of the blade.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/jcoseik/2021-034-06/N0040340608/images/Figure_jcoseik_34_06_08_F5.jpg
Fig. 5.

Shredder blade (a) load cycle used in fatigue analysis, and (b) S-N curve generated from the results obtained from fatigue analysis

3.3 Modal analysis

Modal analysis has been performed on both driving and driven shafts to determine the natural frequencies of the blade-shaft system and their mode shapes(Sohn and Kim, 2015).

Table 3 shows the modal frequencies of the driving and the driven shaft. Driven shaft being operated at slightly lesser speed has marginally lower modal frequencies. However, the lowest modal frequency of 13Hz, equivalent to 780rpm is much higher than the operating speed(30rpm) of the shaft. Therefore, the structure is dynamically safe for the intended operation. Also, similar mode shapes were observed for both the shafts. Initial mode shapes of the driven shaft are shown in Fig. 6. Mode-1 indicates the first bending mode at 13Hz, the torsional mode (Mode-2) can be observed at 35.7Hz, and Mode-3 indicates the second bending mode at 49Hz. These observations imply the reliability of the shredder system for the designed loading conditions.

Table 3.

Modal frequencies of the driving and driven shafts

Modes Frequency(Driving) Frequency(Driven)
1 13.1Hz 13.0Hz
2 36.1Hz 35.7Hz
3 46.5Hz 49.0Hz
4 62.7Hz 62.1Hz

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/jcoseik/2021-034-06/N0040340608/images/Figure_jcoseik_34_06_08_F6.jpg
Fig. 6.

First three mode shapes of the driven shaft

4. Conclusion

The shredding system is the key component of the medical waste sterilization system, with the blades being the most sensitive part of such systems. Taking the 37kW shredder system, we performed stress analysis and predicted the fatigue life of the designed cutting blade. Moreover, dynamic analysis was performed to predict possible failure due to resonance. According to the maximum cutting load subjected to the blade, equivalent maximum von-mises stress was obtained(279MPa), which came out to be much less than the yield stress of the blade material. FOS of 5 was achieved, hence meeting the static strength requirement of the system. The fatigue life at this maximum load using the time series fatigue load spectrum is about 4.23 million cycles. The durability of the shredder blade with varying forces was also proved using the SN curve. Furthermore, the first natural frequency of the system was generated at 13Hz using the dynamic analysis, which is much higher than the operational frequency of the system. Hence, all the design requirements were achieved, and the proposed methodology verified the effectiveness and feasibility of the shredder system to be used in the medical waste sterilization system.

Acknowledgements

본 연구는 2021년도 환경부의 재원으로 한국환경산업기술원(KEITI)의 지원을 받아 “병원 규모에 최적화된 감염우려 의료폐기물 멸균분쇄 시스템 개발”을 수행한 연구결과입니다(No.RE202101609).

References

1
Bae, H.J., Kang, J.E., Lim, Y.R. (2020) Assessment of Relative Asthma Risk in Populations Living Near Incineration Facilities in Seoul, Korea, Int. J. Environ. Res. & Public Health, 17(20), pp.1~12. 10.3390/ijerph1720744833066152PMC7601977
2
Chaiyat, N. (2021) Energy, Exergy, Economic, and Environmental Analysis of an Organic Rankine Cycle Integrating with Infectious Medical Waste Incinerator, Therm. Sci. & Eng. Prog., 22, p.100810. 10.1016/j.tsep.2020.100810
3
Chartier, Y. et al. (2014) Safe Management of Wastes from Health Care Activities, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79(2), pp.171~171.
4
Corum, A., Demir, H.H., Ökten, H.E. (2015) A Comparative Economic Analysis for Medical, Environ. Prot. Eng., 41(3), pp.137~145. 10.37190/epe150310
5
Datta, P., Mohi, G., Chander, J. (2018) Biomedical Waste Management in India: Critical Appraisal, J. Lab. Physicians, 10(01), pp.006~014. 10.4103/JLP.JLP_89_1729403196PMC5784295
6
Gautam, V., Thapar, R., Sharma, M. (2010) Biomedical Waste Management: Incineration vs. Environmental Safety, Indian J. Med. Microbiol., 28(3), pp.191~192. 10.4103/0255-0857.6646520644303
7
Hong, J., Zhan, S., Yu, Z., Hong, J., Qi, C. (2018) Life-Cycle Environmental and Economic Assessment of Medical Waste Treatment, J. Clean. Prod., 174, pp.65~73. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.206
8
Ilyas, S., Srivastava, R.R., Kim, H. (2020) Disinfection Technology and Strategies for COVID-19 Hospital and Bio-Medical Waste Management, Sci. Total Environ., 749, 141652. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14165232822917PMC7419320
9
Kim, J., Jeong, S. (2017) Economic and Environmental Cost Analysis of Incineration and Recovery Alternatives for Flammable Industrial Waste: The case of South Korea, Sustainability, 9(9), 1638. 10.3390/su9091638
10
Kim, S., Eom, Y., Lee, T.G. (2018) Survey of the Mercury- Containing Wastes Released from Various Sources in Korea, J. Ind. & Eng. Chem., 61, pp.288~294. 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.12.026
11
Kythavone, L., Chaiyat, N. (2020) Life Cycle Assessment of a Very Small Organic Rankine Cycle and Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator for Infectious Medical Waste, Therm. Sci. & Eng. Prog., 18, p. 100526. 10.1016/j.tsep.2020.100526
12
Li, Q., Guan, X., Wu, P., Wang, X., Zhou, L., Tong, Y., Feng, Z. (2020) Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia, New England J. Med., 382(13), pp.1199~1207. 10.1056/NEJMoa200131631995857PMC7121484
13
Liu, F., Liu, H.Q., Wei, G.X., Zhang, R., Zeng, T.T., Liu, G.S., Zhou, J.H. (2018) Characteristics and Treatment Methods of Medical Waste Incinerator Fly Ash: A Review, Process., 6(10), pp.1~25. 10.3390/pr6100173
14
Minister of Environment (2020) COVID-19 Waste Safety Management Status Inspection, GoKorea.
15
Oxelösund, S. (2002) Hardox TechSupport, Instant & Small Commer. Print., 21(7), p. 12.
16
Rhee, S.W. (2020) Management of Used Personal Protective Equipment and Wastes Related to COVID-19 in South Korea, Waste Manag. & Res., 38(8), pp.820~824. 10.1177/0734242X2093334332517547
17
Singh, N., Tang, Y., Ogunseitan, O.A. (2020) Environmentally Sustainable Management of Used Personal Protective Equipment, Environ. Sci. & Technol., 54(14), pp.8500~8502. 10.1021/acs.est.0c0302232597663PMC7341685
18
Sohn, J.W., Kim, H.S. (2015) Dynamic Characteristics Recovery of Delaminated Composite Structure, J.Comput. Struct. Eng. Inst. Korea, 28(1), pp.47~52. 10.7734/COSEIK.2015.28.1.47
19
Thind, P.S., Sareen, A., Singh, D.D., Singh, S., John, S. (2021) Compromising Situation of India's Bio-Medical Waste Incineration Units During Pandemic Outbreak of COVID-19: Associated Environmental-Health Impacts and Mitigation Measures, Environ. Pollut., 276, 116621. 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.11662133592442PMC7869633
20
Tsakalou, C., Papamarkou, S., Tsakiridis, P.E., Bartzas, G., Tsakalakis, K. (2018) Characterization and Leachability Evaluation of Medical Wastes Incineration Fly and Bottom Ashes and Their Vitrification Outgrowths, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 6(1), pp.367~376. 10.1016/j.jece.2017.12.012
21
UNESCAP (2020) The Safe Waste Treatment for COVID-19', United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, pp.1~12.
22
Voicu, G., Lazea, M., Constantin, G.A., Stefan, E.M., Munteanu, M.G. (2020) Finite Element Analysis of the Compaction Plate from a Garbage Truck, E3S Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 180, p.04006. 10.1051/e3sconf/202018004006
23
Wang, J., Shen, J., Ye, D., Yan, X., Zhang, Y., Yang, W., Pan, L. (2020) Disinfection Technology of Hospital Wastes and Wastewater: Suggestions for Disinfection Strategy During Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic in China, Environ. Pollut., 262, p. 114665. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.11466532443202PMC7194566
24
WHO (2002) Treatment and Disposal Technologies for Health- Care Waste, Safe Management of Wastes from Health-Care\ Aactivities, pp.77~112.
25
WHO (2018) Health-care Waste. Available at: https://www.who.int/ news-room/fact-sheets/detail/health-care-waste.
26
Zhao, S., Lin, Q., Ran, J., Musa, S.S., Yang, G., Wang, W.,Wang, M.H. (2020) Preliminary Estimation of the Basic Reproduction Number of Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China, from 2019 to 2020: A Data-Driven Analysis in the Early Phase of the Outbreak, Int. J. Infect. Dis., 92, pp.214~217. 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.05032007643PMC7110798
페이지 상단으로 이동하기